close
  • ImageMantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fighting without it being fair for both sides and winning not being due to military tactics is just not British what what.

    Overwhelming firepower is a bit gauche don’t you know. Those Yankees just don’t understand.

    Also, real talk, that’s also why the US loses so often.

    • ImagePugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fighting without it being fair for both sides and winning not being due to military tactics is just not British what what.

      Well, you see, George, I did like it, back in the old days when the prerequisite of a British campaign was that the enemy should under no circumstances carry guns – even spears made us think twice. The kind of people we liked to fight were two feet tall and armed with dry grass.

  • ImageDjehngo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think it has been looked at and even solved; the SA-80 was developed as a rifle that no other military would would be able to use. Or was that no other military would want to use? Either way, job done.