A.
The Common Council of the City of Buffalo hereby finds that certain alcohol product manufacturers have admitted engaging in strategies designed to advertise and promote products to minors and that such strategies undermine state law prohibiting the sale or distribution of alcohol products to minors. The Council further finds that exposure of minors to such alcohol product advertising and promotion may be constitutionally restricted through the enactment of reasonable targeted limitations on the advertising and promotion of such products near schools and other like locations regularly frequented by children so as to strengthen compliance with and enforcement of laws prohibiting the sale or distribution of alcohol products to children and protect children against such illegal sales.
B.
The Council is cognizant of the necessity of acting within the protections afforded by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and has, therefore, narrowly tailored the scope and effect of this legislation to impose reasonable time, place and manner restrictions on alcohol advertising aimed at or regularly seen by youth while not directly affecting advertising at adults.
C.
It is well settled law that the First Amendment protects commercial speech but to a lesser degree than the protection afforded other, "fully protected speech." In analyzing the constitutionality of commercial speech regulation, the United States Supreme Court prescribed a four-prong test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980). The Central Hudson test includes the following four prongs:
(1)
Whether the commercial speech at issue concerns a lawful activity and is not misleading;
(2)
Whether the asserted governmental interest in restricting the commercial speech is substantial;
(3)
The restriction must directly advance the governmental interest asserted; and
(4)
That the restrictions are not more extensive than are necessary to serve that governmental interest.
D.
The restrictions on commercial speech contained in this Council legislation are permissible under the Central Hudson four-prong test. The commercial speech at issue concerns a lawful activity and is not misleading, at least as it applies to consenting adults. The governmental interest in restricting the commercial speech at issue is one grounded in the preexisting prohibition on the sale and distribution of alcohol products to minors and directly related to countering the adverse impact of an industry strategy admittedly directed at younger prospective drinkers. By restricting modes of advertisement and locations for advertisements that are more likely to be addressed to and seen by minors, this Council legislation directly advances the governmental interest in enforcing the ban on the sale and distribution of alcohol products to minors. Finally, as the restrictions in this Council legislation focus on modes and locations of communication that are more likely than not to have a direct impact upon minors, namely sites within 1,000 feet of a school, child day-care center, children's institution, youth center, playground or amusement arcade, the restrictions contained in this Council legislation are not more extensive than are necessary to serve the governmental interests asserted herein. Other forms of advertising, including newspapers, magazines, audio and video media, that are less likely to have a direct impact on minors are not affected by this Council legislation.