There's a lot of literature to this problem to arrange here, for this problem.
Perhaps, one can start searching for all the literature on this one, from this paper of K. Pinn.
| Likes this problem | Rafikzeraoulia2025, zendenfell, lof310, rithvikr |
| Interested in collaborating | Rafikzeraoulia2025 |
| Currently working on this problem | Rafikzeraoulia2025 |
| This problem looks difficult | Rafikzeraoulia2025 |
| This problem looks tractable | lof310 |
| The results on this problem could be formalisable | None |
| I am working on formalising the results on this problem | None |
There's a lot of literature to this problem to arrange here, for this problem.
Perhaps, one can start searching for all the literature on this one, from this paper of K. Pinn.
I extended direct computation of Hofstadter's \(Q\)-sequence\[
Q(1)=Q(2)=1,\qquad Q(n)=Q(n-Q(n-1))+Q(n-Q(n-2))
\]to \(n\le {110000000}\) (iterative DP, no recursion). In this range the recurrence never attempts an invalid index: \(n-Q(n-1)\ge 2\) and \(n-Q(n-2)\ge 2\) for all \(3\le n\le 110\cdot 10^6\) (so no ''death'' event observed).
For reference, the initial segment I used to sanity-check is:\[
\begin{aligned}
&1,1,2,3,3,4,5,5,6,6,6,8,8,8,10,9,10,11,11,12,12,12,14,14,14,16,16,16,18,17,\\
&18,19,19,20,20,21,21,21,23,23,23,25,25,25,27,27,27,29,28,29,30,30,31,31,31,\\
&33,33,33,35,35,35,37,36,37,38,38,39,39,39,41,41,41,43,43,43,45,45,45,47,46,\\
&47,48,48,49,49,49,51,51,51,53,53,53,55,\dots
\end{aligned}
\]I also checked attainability of small values and found that the set of missing values in \(\{1,\dots,200\}\) is unchanged from the known ''not reached'' list:\[
\begin{aligned}
&7,13,15,18,27,29,34,36,49,51,59,67,70,74,81,89,95,97,98,99,102,103,117,126,\\
&127,131,134,141,142,145,150,158,163,166,181,183,189,191,195,197,198,199.
\end{aligned}
\]In particular, \(7\) does not occur among \(\{Q(1),\dots,Q(110\cdot 10^6)\}\). The ''missing in \(\{1,\dots,2000\}\)'' count I observed is \(302\).
As a crude density snapshot (tracking attained values \(\le {200000}\) within this run), the missing fraction \(m(K)/K\) at \(K=10^3,10^4,10^5,2\cdot 10^5\) is approximately \(0.169,0.1397,0.13805,0.137135\), suggesting stabilization near \(\sim 0.13\) at these scales (purely empirical).
Log in to add a comment.