Pre-flight checklist
Forge version
7.10.2
Electron version
39.2.6
Operating system
macOS 26.1
Last known working Forge version
No response
Expected behavior
When running an audit, one discovers that webpack-dev-server up until version 5.2.0 are vulnerable:
Package: webpack-dev-server
Version(s) <=5.2.0
webpack-dev-server users' source code may be stolen when they access a malicious web site with non-Chromium based browser (Severity: moderate)
URL: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9jgg-88mc-972h
While this is possibly less relevant in most cases, it might be an easy fix to just update webpack-dev-server. Link to advisory: GHSA-9jgg-88mc-972h
Actual behavior
I don't know if there are any weird inconsistencies when updating the dependency, and unfortunately have little time to test this out myself, that's why I opened this issue rather than proposing a PR outright, which I can't test properly
Steps to reproduce
run npm audit on a package.json that includes somewhere a vulnerable version of webpack-dev-server.
Additional information
I couldn't find a SECURITY file. Also, since I believe this to be benign and the advisory is already a few months old, I decided that opening a public issue is probably not too critical.
Pre-flight checklist
Forge version
7.10.2
Electron version
39.2.6
Operating system
macOS 26.1
Last known working Forge version
No response
Expected behavior
When running an audit, one discovers that
webpack-dev-serverup until version 5.2.0 are vulnerable:While this is possibly less relevant in most cases, it might be an easy fix to just update
webpack-dev-server. Link to advisory: GHSA-9jgg-88mc-972hActual behavior
I don't know if there are any weird inconsistencies when updating the dependency, and unfortunately have little time to test this out myself, that's why I opened this issue rather than proposing a PR outright, which I can't test properly
Steps to reproduce
run
npm auditon apackage.jsonthat includes somewhere a vulnerable version ofwebpack-dev-server.Additional information
I couldn't find a
SECURITYfile. Also, since I believe this to be benign and the advisory is already a few months old, I decided that opening a public issue is probably not too critical.