Unclear Licenses in @contentlayer/* projects

[schickling]

Discussed in #481

^{Originally posted by joergrech June 7, 2023}
Hi, I just ran npx license-checker --summary on my project and found out that several (sub-)projects from @contentlayer/* have no license. Is this intentional or just an oversight? I'm not a lawyer but I think technically that would mean that contentlayer uses unlicensed code and is therefore not "fully" MIT.

Here are the packages without licenses:

    "@contentlayer/cli@0.2.9": {
        "licenses": "UNKNOWN",
    },
    "@contentlayer/client@0.2.9": {
        "licenses": "UNKNOWN",
    },
    "@contentlayer/core@0.2.9": {
        "licenses": "UNKNOWN",
    },
    "@contentlayer/source-files@0.2.9": {
        "licenses": "UNKNOWN",
    },
    "@contentlayer/utils@0.2.9": {
        "licenses": "UNKNOWN",
    },
```</div>

[schickling]

This should be addressed with the 0.3.4 release. 🎉