The paper reexamines the historical and prehistorical relationships between the Indus Valley and Mesopotamia, suggesting that long-distance trade initiated from the Indus is pivotal to understanding their interactions. Utilizing recent archaeological findings and chronological studies, it discusses the significant impact of environmental changes on these relations and the cultivation of aquatic resources that parallel the genesis of civilization in these regions. Additionally, it critiques past scholarly interpretations, emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted agricultural and aquatic economy in the development of Sumerian civilization.
Key takeaways
AI generated
The Indus-Mesopotamia relationship necessitates reconsideration due to emerging archaeological and chronological evidence.
Recent studies suggest long-distance trade began from the Indus towards Mesopotamia in prehistory.
The sea-level rise dramatically altered the geography, impacting the Indus-Mesopotamia connection.
Evidence points to a rich aquatic diet influencing civilization emergence in both regions.
Trade patterns evolved, with the Indus potentially influencing Mesopotamian commerce significantly.
Figures
Fig. 1: The western coastline of the Indian Ocean about 10,000 BC; an approximation necessarily inaccurate in detail (drawn by Ann Searight). Fig. 2: Alternative chronologies for Early Mesopotamia and the Gulf trade. Fig. 3: The evolution of commercial expeditions between the Indus and Mesopotamia: one of many possible models sug- gesting the principal destinations of outward-bound ships.
Aström, P. (ed). 1989. High, Middle or Low: Acts of an International Colloquium on Absolute Chronology held at the University of 3100- 2700 2600 2400- 2300 2200 2150- 2100 2050 2018- 1930 1911 1900- 1650 Jamdat Nasr- Early Dynastic I Early Dynastic II Early Dynastic III End of Early Dynastic Middle Agade End of Agade Early-Middle Ur III End of Ur III Isin-Larsa/Old Babylonian
Belcher, W.R. 1994. Multiple approaches towards reconstruction of fishing technology: net making and the Indus Valley tradition. Pp. 129-141 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wisconsin.
Biagi, P. 1994. A radiocarbon chronology for the aceramic shell- middens of coastal Oman. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 5: 17-31.
Bibby, G. 1970. Looking for Dilmun. London.
Braunswig, R.H. 1975. Radiocarbon dating and the Indus civiliza- tion: calibration and chronology. East and West 25: 111-145.
Chakrabarti, D.K. 1990. The external trade of the Indus civilization. New Delhi.
Collon, D. 1986. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum: Cylinder seals III: Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian Periods. London.
---. 1990. Interpreting the Past: Near Eastern Seals. London.
Crawford, H.E.W. 1973. Mesopotamia's invisible exports in the third millennium B.C. World Archaeology 5: 232-241.
Diakonoff, I.M. 1992. Elam. Pp. 1-24 in I. Gershevitch (ed) The Cambridge History of Iran. Vol. 2: The Median and Achaemenian periods. Cambridge.
During Caspers, E.C.L. 1979. Sumer, coastal Arabia and the Indus valley in Protoliterate and Early Dynastic eras: supporting evidence for a cultural linkage. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient XXII: 121-135.
---. 1991. The Indus Valley 'unicorn': a Near Eastern connec- tion? Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient XXXIV: 312-350.
Edens, C. 1993. Indus-Arabian interaction during the Bronze Age: a review of evidence. Pp. 335-363 in G.L. Possehl (ed) Harappan Civilization: a recent perspective. Second revised edition. New Delhi.
Franke-Vogt, U. 1994. The "Early Period" at Mohenjo-daro. Pp. 27-49 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wiscon- sin.
Gasche, H., J.A. Armstrong, S.W. Cole & V.G. Gurzadyan. 1998. Dating the Fall of Babylon: a Reappraisal of Second-Millennium Chronology (A Joint Ghent-Chicago Project) (MHEM IV). Ghent & Chicago.
Glover, I.C. 1996. Early trade between India and Southeast Asia. Pp. 365-400 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
Høyrup, J. 1992. Sumerian: the descendant of a proto-historical creole? An alternative approach to the "Sumerian problem". Annali del seminario di studi del mondo classico, Sezione linguistica 14: 21-73.
Kinnier Wilson, J.V. 1987. Fish rations and the Indus script: some new arguments in the case for accountancy. South Asian Studies 3: 41-46.
Lal, B.B. 1994. The chronological horizon of the Mature Indus civilization. Pp. 15-25 in J.M. Kenoyer (ed) From Sumer to Meluhha: Contributions to the Archaeology of South and West Asia in Memory of George F. Dales, Jr. (Wisconsin Archaeological Reports, vol. 3). Wisconsin.
Meyer, C., J.M. Todd & C.W. Beck. 1991. From Zanzibar to the Zagros: a copal pendant from Eshnunna. Journal of Near Eastern Studies L: 289-298.
Michalowski, P. 1988. Magan and Meluhha once again. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 40: 156-164.
Nair, R.R. & N.H. Hashimi. 1988. Absence of terraces on a submerged carbonate bank and its implication to Holocene sea level transgression on the western continental margin of India. Pp. 83-86 in S.R. Rao (ed) Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries. Proceedings of the First Indian Conference on Marine Archaeology of Indian Ocean Countries -Oct 1987. Goa.
Possehl, G.L. 1996. Meluhha. Pp. 133-208 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
Possehl, G.L. & P.C. Rissman. 1992. The chronology of pre- historic India: from earliest times to the Iron Age. Pp 465-490 in R.W. Ehrich (ed) Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, vol. I. Third edition. Chicago & London.
Potts, D.T. 1990. The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity. Vol. I: From Prehis- tory to the Fall of the Achaemenid Empire. Oxford.
---. 1993. Tell Abraq and the Harappan tradition in South- eastern Arabia. Pp. 324-333 in G.L. Possehl (ed) Harappan Civilization: a recent perspective. Second revised edition. New Delhi.
Ratnagar, S. 1981. Encounters. The Westerly Trade of the Harappa Civilization. Delhi.
Reade, J.E. 1979. Early Etched Beads and the Indus-Mesopotamia Trade (British Museum Occasional Paper, no. 2). London.
---. 1986. Commerce or conquest: variations in the Mesopo- tamia-Dilmun relationship. Pp. 325-334 in Sheikha H.A. Al Khalifa & M. Rice (eds) Bahrain through the Ages: The Archae- ology. London.
---. 1995. Magan and Meluhha merchants at Ur? Pp. 597-600 in U. Finkbeiner, R. Dittmann & H. Hauptmann (eds) Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz.
---. 1996. Introduction: Evolution in Indian Ocean studies. Pp. 13-20 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
---. 1997. Sumerian origins. Pp. 221-229 in I.L. Finkel & M.J. Geller (eds) Sumerian Gods and their Representations. (Cuneiform Monographs 7). Groningen.
---. 2001. Assyrian king-lists, the Royal Tombs of Ur, and Indus origins. Journal of Near Eastern Studies LX: 1-29.
Salonen, A. 1970. Die Fischerei im alten Mesopotamien nach Sumerisch-Akkadischen Quellen. (Annales Academiae Scientia- rum Fennicae, Series B, vol. 166). Helsinki.
Shaffer, J.G. 1992. The Indus Valley, Baluchistan, and Helmand traditions: Neolithic through Bronze Age. Pp. 441-464 in R.W. Ehrich (ed) Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, vol. 1. Third edition. Chicago & London.
Vogt, B. 1996. Bronze Age maritime trade in the Indian Ocean: Harappan traits on the Oman peninsula. Pp. 107-132 in J.E. Reade (ed) The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. London.
J. READE, Dept. of Western Asiatic Antiquities, The British Museum, London WC1B 3DG, United Kingdom. [email protected]
