|
8 hours ago
loupiote
13 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Error 503 Service Unavailable anotherjesse is not actively maintaining the userscripts-mirror.org server. so i guess, if no-one else is maintaining it, this website will die slowly. as we have seen recently, it is not reachable anymore, or service is not stable. e.g. currently userscripts-mirror.org is only reachable on port 8080. |
|
11 hours ago
krisu
38 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Backups for Userscripts.org Small backups for USO scripts are made by fellow redditors, you can find the download links here: http://www.reddit.com/r/userscripts/comments/25k1c5/userscripts_userjs_file_archive_ready_to_download/ And there’s bigger backup project (always) going on ArchiveBot (maintained by Archiveteam), over 15GB already saved! You can see the ArchiveBot’s progress here: http://archivebot.at.ninjawedding.org:4567/ (scroll down or CTRL+F “userscripts-mirror.org”) |
|
16 hours ago
Pizdato
1 post
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Error 503 Service Unavailable |
|
17 hours ago
Barbarossa69
399 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / 413 Request Entity Too Large OK I just tried it.. I can upload a script of 0.99MB but not one of 1.00MB. |
|
18 hours ago
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / 413 Request Entity Too Large Barbarossa69 wrote:I am not entirely sure of his accuracy. Last I read it was 2MiB for nginx and PHP is 2MiB u/l with 3MiB post size. More factors come into effect with migration, including platforms across the networked machines, distro, version, etc. as well. It could have been changed to a different number, then modified more than once. Try uploading a 1MiB exactly file temporarily to test to see if some of these numbers correspond. So there basically isn't any real way to know until you try. If this were one of goo's sites they'd have specific regions and specific profiles set to limits on an individual needs... which can be severely abused... but that's another long story. So depending on the servers available each may have different limitations. A lot is done in the backend and piped/bridged out... hence why there are sometimes 502's. :) |
|
21 hours ago
Barbarossa69
399 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / 413 Request Entity Too Large I assume the limit is 1MB because according to the greasyfork admin that is the default limit on nginx. |
|
May 15, 2014
loupiote
13 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / Error 503 Service Unavailable for the last couple of days, userscripts.otg is unreachable. Only http://userscripts-mirror.org/ works. who is the sysadm in charge of this site's server? how can he/she be contacted? are they aware of those issues? |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS trespassersW wrote:Already tried that. ;) trespassersW wrote:Currently in a clean profile Redirector adds it in the Add-on bar which is removed in Firefox 29+... but the Add-on and rule is enabled. |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / 413 Request Entity Too Large Barbarossa69 wrote:Have you actually tested to see if this is the real limit? Barbarossa69 wrote:With an educated guess probably to limit spam scripts and also encourage usage of @require and @resource is a thought or two.
Barbarossa69 wrote:I haven't heard anything back from the specific inquiry mentioned here but whatever the exact size is it is probably going to stick since it has been a while. Still best to reduce your code if possible. Barbarossa69 wrote:If I do hear/read something further I'll be sure to post it. :) |
|
May 15, 2014
Barbarossa69
399 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / 413 Request Entity Too Large (Bump) Does anyone know the reason why the upload limit of 1MB has been introduced recently, and whether it can be raised to 2MB to match Greasyfork? |
|
May 15, 2014
trespassersW
82 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS enigma.. maybe it's worth to bother with example url? edit: stupid guess: don't you see R in red circle icon somewhere on your toolbar? click on it, if so. |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS Here's my screen caps... I didn't bother with the   Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 (29.0.1 Moz 64bit) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 (29.0.1 Moz 32bit on 64bit Win7) Redirector 2.8.1 Clean profiles |
|
May 15, 2014
trespassersW
82 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS new tab, GM off, exactly https://userscripts-mirror.org , Fx28 |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS trespassersW wrote:Might be an Add-on issue or a cross-platform issue. I see exactly https://userscripts-mirror.org even after a page refresh just to be sure and disabled GM.
This is the firebug edit html
<a href="https://userscripts-mirror.org">https://userscripts-mirror.org</a> Just tried it in a clean profile with just Redirector and same results... no go. |
|
May 15, 2014
trespassersW
82 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS well, i see http://userscripts-mirror.org/ (using Redirector) |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS trespassersW wrote:Open in existing tab, or open in a new tab, or paste into the address bar, or open from bookmarks ... this absolute url of https://userscripts-mirror.org times out for me too. |
|
May 15, 2014
trespassersW
82 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS Marti wrote:Can you provide an example when it doesn't work? |
|
May 15, 2014
Marti
4508 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS LL25255252 wrote:I believe it only works if a page is successfully loaded first. Initial page load from about:blank or about:newtab (and bookmarks that open in new tabs, address bar, etc.) will still timeout if using the default port. The potential Add-on needs to observe what is being requested and alter the request (from the address bar, bookmarks, etc.) Any of the existing "workarounds" shown here still won't help those behind a proxy that blocks any alternate ports.
|
|
May 15, 2014
Digifan23
156 posts
|
|
|
May 15, 2014
LL25255252
294 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS @trespassersW and @Alexo,
|
|
May 14, 2014
Neewb
99 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS If the GreasyFork dude is reading this, then at the very least, put in something basic like Twitter Bootstrap so the site looks decent. |
|
May 14, 2014
Mikha
65 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS Any ETA ? Thx ! |
|
May 14, 2014
erosman
526 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS What is the latest?
PS. I see even with the serve problems, spammers/malware posters still manage to post their spam/scripts. |
|
May 14, 2014
erosman
526 posts
|
Topic: Script development / Table Color Change You can write a script, but changing color or most CSS based changes can be done easier with Stylish Addon. |
|
May 13, 2014
krisu
38 posts
|
Topic: Userscripts.org discussion / WEBSITE DOWN FOR MOST USERS Makaze: http://userscripts-mirror.org/topics/215963?page=1#posts-621590 |
