close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010;2(3):194-207.

Biomedical infertility care in sub-Saharan Africa: a social science-- review of current practices, experiences and view points

Affiliations
Review

Biomedical infertility care in sub-Saharan Africa: a social science-- review of current practices, experiences and view points

T Gerrits et al. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010.

Abstract

Some sort of infertility treatments, including the use of advanced reproductive technologies (ARTs), is nowadays provided at several places in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, to date only a few studies have actually looked into the way these treatments are offered, used and experienced. In this review article the authors present and discuss empirical study findings that give insight into the way biomedical infertility care is provided, considered, experienced and/or used in sub-Saharan African countries. They concentrate on four themes that were often referred to in the reviewed studies and underline the importance of taking into account the local sociocultural context and notions when developing and implementing infertility care, namely: counselling, male involvement, acceptability of ARTs and the use of donor material (semen and embryos). In the conclusion the authors emphasize the importance of preventing infertility as part of integrated reproductive health programs and the need to improve the quality of (low tech) infertility care in the public health sector by means of standardized guidelines, training of health staff and improved counselling. In addition, from a reproductive rights perspective, they support initiatives to introduce low cost ARTs to treat tubal factor related infertility. They also point to potential unintended side effects of the introduction of ARTs and the use of donor material in the sub-Saharan African context, affecting gender inequity and inequity between citizens from different social classes, and argue that such effects should be acknowledged and avoided by all possible means. Finally, they present an agenda for future social science research on this topic in sub-Saharan Africa.

Keywords: Africa; counselling; donor material; infertility; men; reproductive rights; reproductive technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aghanwa HS, Dare FO, Ogunniyi SO. Sociodemographic factors in mental disorders associated with infertility in Nigeria. J Psychosomatic Rev. 1999;46:117–123. - PubMed
    1. Alper M, Brindsen PR, Fischer R, et al. Is your IVF programme good? Hum Reprod. 2002;17:8–10. - PubMed
    1. Fallon J. Associates of self-reported fertility status and infertility treatment-seeking in a rural district of Malawi. Hum Reprod. 2005a;20:2229–2236. - PubMed
    1. Fallon J. Unmet fertility expectations and the perception of fertility problems in a Malawian village. J Reprod Health. 2005b;9:14–25. - PubMed
    1. Boerma JT, Mgalla Z. Women and infertility in sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KIT; 2001.

LinkOut - more resources