The controversial "Cambrian" fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older
- PMID: 19416859
- PMCID: PMC2683128
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812460106
The controversial "Cambrian" fossils of the Vindhyan are real but more than a billion years older
Abstract
The age of the Vindhyan sedimentary basin in central India is controversial, because geochronology indicating early Proterozoic ages clashes with reports of Cambrian fossils. We present here an integrated paleontologic-geochronologic investigation to resolve this conundrum. New sampling of Lower Vindhyan phosphoritic stromatolitic dolomites from the northern flank of the Vindhyans confirms the presence of fossils most closely resembling those found elsewhere in Cambrian deposits: annulated tubes, embryo-like globules with polygonal surface pattern, and filamentous and coccoidal microbial fabrics similar to Girvanella and Renalcis. None of the fossils, however, can be ascribed to uniquely Cambrian or Ediacaran taxa. Indeed, the embryo-like globules are not interpreted as fossils at all but as former gas bubbles trapped in mucus-rich cyanobacterial mats. Direct dating of the same fossiliferous phosphorite yielded a Pb-Pb isochron of 1,650 +/- 89 (2sigma) million years ago, confirming the Paleoproterozoic age of the fossils. New U-Pb geochronology of zircons from tuffaceous mudrocks in the Lower Vindhyan Porcellanite Formation on the southern flank of the Vindhyans give comparable ages. The Vindhyan phosphorites provide a window of 3-dimensionally preserved Paleoproterozoic fossils resembling filamentous and coccoidal cyanobacteria and filamentous eukaryotic algae, as well as problematic forms. Like Neoproterozoic phosphorites a billion years later, the Vindhyan deposits offer important new insights into the nature and diversity of life, and in particular, the early evolution of multicellular eukaryotes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ray JS. Age of the Vindhyan Supergroup: A review of recent findings. J Earth System Sci. 2006;115:149–160.
-
- Malone SJ, et al. Paleomagnetism and detrital zircon geochronology of the Upper Vindhyan Sequence, Son Valley and Rajasthan, India: A ca. 1000 Ma closure age for the Purana Basins? Precambrian Res. 2008;164:137–159.
-
- Azmi RJ. Discovery of Lower Cambrian small shelly fossils and brachiopods from the Lower Vindhyan of Son Valley, Central India. J Geol Soc India. 1998;52:381–389.
-
- Azmi RJ, et al. Age of the Vindhyan Supergroup of Central India: An exposition of biochronology vs radiochronology. In: Sinha D, editor. Micropaleontology: Application in Stratigraphy and Paleoceanography. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; 2006. pp. 29–62.
-
- Joshi D, Azmi RJ, Srivastava SS. Earliest Cambrian calcareous skeletal algae from Tirohan Dolomite, Chitrakoot, Central India: A new age constraint for the Lower Vindhyan. Gondwana Geol Magazine. 2006;21:73–82.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
