close
Jump to content

Distributed manufacturing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Distributed manufacturing, also known as distributed production, cloud producing, distributed digital manufacturing, and local manufacturing, is a form of decentralized manufacturing practiced by enterprises using a network of geographically dispersed manufacturing facilities that are coordinated using information technology. It can also refer to local manufacture via the historic cottage industry model, or manufacturing that takes place in the homes of consumers.

Enterprise

[edit]

In enterprise environments, the primary attribute of distributed manufacturing is the ability to create value at geographically dispersed locations. For example, shipping costs could be minimized when products are built geographically close to their intended markets.[1] Also, products manufactured in a number of small facilities distributed over a wide area can be customized with details adapted to individual or regional tastes. Manufacturing components in different physical locations and then managing the supply chain to bring them together for final assembly of a product is also considered a form of distributed manufacturing.[2][3] Digital networks combined with additive manufacturing allow companies a decentralized and geographically independent distributed production (cloud manufacturing).[4]

Consumer

[edit]

Within the maker movement and DIY culture, small scale production by consumers often using peer-to-peer resources is being referred to as distributed manufacturing. Consumers download digital designs from an open design repository website like Youmagine or Thingiverse and produce a product for low costs through a distributed network of 3D printing services such as 3D Hubs, Geomiq. In the most distributed form of distributed manufacturing the consumer becomes a prosumer and manufacturers products at home[5] with an open-source 3-D printer such as the RepRap.[6][7] In 2013 a desktop 3-D printer could be economically justified as a personal product fabricator and the number of free and open hardware designs were growing exponentially.[8] Today there are millions of open hardware product designs at hundreds of repositories[9] and there is some evidence consumers are 3-D printing to save money. For example, 2017 case studies probed the quality of: (1) six common complex toys; (2) Lego blocks; and (3) the customizability of open source board games and found that all filaments analyzed saved the prosumer over 75% of the cost of commercially available true alternative toys and over 90% for recyclebot filament.[10] Overall, these results indicate a single 3D printing repository, MyMiniFactory, is saving consumers well over $60 million/year in offset purchases of only toys.[10] These 3-D printers can now be used to make sophisticated high-value products like scientific instruments.[11][12] Similarly, a study in 2022 found that 81% of open source designs provided economic savings and the total savings for the 3D printing community is more than $35 million from downloading only the top 100 products at YouMagine.[13] In general, the savings are largest when compared to conventional products when prosumers use recycled materials in 'distributed recycling and additive manufacturing' (DRAM).[14]

Emergency Distributed Manufacturing During COVID-19 Pandemic

[edit]

Distributed manufacturing became far more visible during the COVID-19 pandemic because it offered a practical response to the breakdown of centralized global supply chains.[15] As lock downs, border restrictions, and factory shutdowns disrupted conventional production, decentralized networks using local facilities such as Open Source Medical Supplies stepped in and manufactured over 48 million products.[16] Additive manufacturing /3D printing[17] were used to produce urgently needed items such as face shields[18][19], ventilators and their components[20][21], nasopharyngeal swabs[22][23][24], and other personal protective equipment.[25][26] This demonstrated that distributed manufacturing could reduce lead times, improve responsiveness, and lessen dependence on distant suppliers during crisis conditions for a wide range of products.[27] Peer-reviewed studies on pandemic-era manufacturing note that additive manufacturing was especially valuable because digital design files could be shared rapidly and produced close to the point of need, enabling hospitals, universities, small firms, and maker communities to supplement strained medical supply chains.[28] The pandemic also helped shift distributed manufacturing from being seen as a niche or experimental model to a credible strategy for resilience, flexibility, and emergency response.[29] At the same time, scholars caution that its wider adoption depends on solving issues related to quality assurance, regulation, material consistency, and coordination across distributed production sites[30]. Overall, COVID-19 popularized distributed manufacturing by showing that localized, digitally enabled production could complement traditional manufacturing systems when speed, adaptability, and supply-chain resilience were critical[31].

Social change

[edit]

Some[32][33][34] call attention to the conjunction of commons-based peer production with distributed manufacturing techniques. The self-reinforced fantasy of a system of eternal growth can be overcome with the development of economies of scope, and here, the civil society can play an important role contributing to the raising of the whole productive structure to a higher plateau of more sustainable and customised productivity.[32] Further, it is true that many issues, problems and threats rise due to the large democratization of the means of production, and especially regarding the physical ones.[32] For instance, the recyclability of advanced nanomaterials is still questioned; weapons manufacturing could become easier; not to mention the implications on counterfeiting[35] and on "intellectual property".[36] It might be maintained that in contrast to the industrial paradigm whose competitive dynamics were about economies of scale, commons-based peer production and distributed manufacturing could develop economies of scope. While the advantages of scale rest on cheap global transportation, the economies of scope share infrastructure costs (intangible and tangible productive resources), taking advantage of the capabilities of the fabrication tools.[32] And following Neil Gershenfeld[37] in that "some of the least developed parts of the world need some of the most advanced technologies", commons-based peer production and distributed manufacturing may offer the necessary tools for thinking globally but act locally in response to certain problems and needs. As well as supporting individual personal manufacturing [38] social and economic benefits are expected to result from the development of local production economies. In particular, the humanitarian and development sector are becoming increasingly interested in how distributed manufacturing can overcome the supply chain challenges of last mile distribution.[39] Further, distributed manufacturing has been proposed as a key element in the Cosmopolitan localism or cosmolocalism framework to reconfigure production by prioritizing socio-ecological well-being over corporate profits, over-production and excess consumption.[40]

Technology

[edit]

By localizing manufacturing, distributed manufacturing may enable a balance between two opposite extreme qualities in technology development: Low technology and High tech.[41] This balance is understood as an inclusive middle, a "mid-tech", that may go beyond the two polarities, incorporating them into a higher synthesis. Thus, in such an approach, low-tech and high-tech stop being mutually exclusive. They instead become a dialectic totality. Mid-tech may be abbreviated to "both…and…" instead of "neither…nor…". Mid-tech combines the efficiency and versatility of digital/automated technology with low-tech's potential for autonomy and resilience.[41]

Contracting in Distributed Manufacturing

[edit]

Research into contracting and order processing models tailored for distributed manufacturing has highlighted the need for flexible, role-based frameworks and advanced digital tools.[42] These tools and frameworks are essential for addressing issues related to quality assurance, payment structures, legal compliance, and coordination among multiple actors. By addressing these challenges, contracting models for distributed manufacturing can unlock its potential for more localized, efficient, and sustainable production systems. A system prototype has been developed to simplify contracting for distributed manufacturing. This tool allows buyers to manage orders across multiple manufacturers using a single interface, automating workflows to ensure clarity and accountability for everyone involved. This research was led by the Internet of Production, as part of the mAkE project (African European Maker Innovation Ecosystem), funded by the European Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Durach, Christian F.; Kurpjuweit, Stefan; Wagner, Stephan M. (2017-09-25). "The impact of additive manufacturing on supply chains". International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 47 (10): 954–971. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-11-2016-0332. ISSN 0960-0035.
  2. ^ Chrisman, Ray. "Enhancement of Distributed Manufacturing using expanded Process Intensification Concepts" (PDF). University of Washington. Retrieved 7 May 2013.
  3. ^ Hermann Kühnle (2010). Distributed Manufacturing: Paradigm, Concepts, Solutions and Examples. Springer. ISBN 978-1-84882-707-3. Retrieved 7 May 2013.
  4. ^ Felix Bopp (2010). Future Business Models by Additive Manufacturing. Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8366-8508-5. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
  5. ^ Petersen, Emily E.; Pearce, Joshua (2017). "Emergence of Home Manufacturing in the Developed World: Return on Investment for Open-Source 3-D Printers". Technologies. 5 (1): 7. doi:10.3390/technologies5010007. ISSN 2227-7080.
  6. ^ Sells, Ed, Zach Smith, Sebastien Bailard, Adrian Bowyer, and Vik Olliver. "Reprap: the replicating rapid prototyper: maximizing customizability by breeding the means of production." HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH IN MASS CUSTOMIZATION AND PERSONALIZATION, (2010).
  7. ^ Jones, R., Haufe, P., Sells, E., Iravani, P., Olliver, V., Palmer, C., & Bowyer, A. (2011). Reprap??? the replicating rapid prototyper. Robotica, 29(1), 177-191.
  8. ^ Wittbrodt, B. T.; Glover, A. G.; Laureto, J.; Anzalone, G. C.; Oppliger, D.; Irwin, J. L.; Pearce, J. M. (2013-09-01). "Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers". Mechatronics. 23 (6): 713–726. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002. ISSN 0957-4158. S2CID 1766321.
  9. ^ "Printable part sources - RepRap". reprap.org. Retrieved 2023-03-02.
  10. ^ a b Petersen, Emily E.; Kidd, Romain W.; Pearce, Joshua M. (2017). "Impact of DIY Home Manufacturing with 3D Printing on the Toy and Game Market". Technologies. 5 (3): 45. doi:10.3390/technologies5030045. ISSN 2227-7080.
  11. ^ Coakley, Meghan; Hurt, Darrell E. (2016-08-01). "3D Printing in the Laboratory: Maximize Time and Funds with Customized and Open-Source Labware". SLAS Technology. Special Issue: Collaborative 3D Printing Technology. 21 (4): 489–495. doi:10.1177/2211068216649578. ISSN 2472-6303. PMC 5380887. PMID 27197798.
  12. ^ Baden, Tom; Chagas, Andre Maia; Gage, Greg; Marzullo, Timothy; Prieto-Godino, Lucia L.; Euler, Thomas (2015-03-20). "Open Labware: 3-D Printing Your Own Lab Equipment". PLOS Biology. 13 (3) e1002086. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002086. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 4368627. PMID 25794301.
  13. ^ Pearce, Joshua; Qian, Jun-Yu (2022-07-15). "Economic Impact of DIY Home Manufacturing of Consumer Products with Low-cost 3D Printing from Free and Open Source Designs". European Journal of Social Impact and Circular Economy. 3 (2): 1–24. doi:10.13135/2704-9906/6508. ISSN 2704-9906.
  14. ^ Cruz Sanchez, Fabio A.; Boudaoud, Hakim; Hoppe, Sandrine; Camargo, Mauricio (2017-10-01). "Polymer recycling in an open-source additive manufacturing context: Mechanical issues". Additive Manufacturing. 17: 87–105. Bibcode:2017AddM...17...87C. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013. ISSN 2214-8604.
  15. ^ Moosavi, Javid; Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.; Dulebenets, Maxim A. (2022-06-01). "Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 75 102983. Bibcode:2022IJDRR..7502983M. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983. ISSN 2212-4209. PMC 9027543. PMID 35475018.
  16. ^ "Open Source Medical Supplies". Open Source Medical Supplies. Retrieved 2026-05-04.
  17. ^ Longhitano, Guilherme Arthur; Nunes, Guilherme Bitencourt; Candido, Geovany; da Silva, Jorge Vicente Lopes (2021-02-01). "The role of 3D printing during COVID-19 pandemic: a review". Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 6 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1007/s40964-020-00159-x. ISSN 2363-9520. PMC 7685299. PMID 38624444.
  18. ^ Amin, Dina; Nguyen, Nam; Roser, Steven M.; Abramowicz, Shelly (August 2020). "3D Printing of Face Shields During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Technical Note". Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 78 (8): 1275–1278. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.040. ISSN 0278-2391. PMC 7194067. PMID 32404268.
  19. ^ Little, Helen A.; Tanikella, Nagendra G.; J. Reich, Matthew; Fiedler, Matthew J.; Snabes, Samantha L.; Pearce, Joshua M. (2020-09-25). "Towards Distributed Recycling with Additive Manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks". Materials. 13 (19): 4273. Bibcode:2020Mate...13.4273L. doi:10.3390/ma13194273. ISSN 1996-1944. PMC 7578976. PMID 32992735.
  20. ^ Kalkanis, Konstantinos; Kiskira, Kyriaki; Papageorgas, Panagiotis; Kaminaris, Stavros D.; Piromalis, Dimitrios; Banis, George; Mpelesis, Dimitrios; Batagiannis, Athanasios (2023-02-04). "Advanced Manufacturing Design of an Emergency Mechanical Ventilator via 3D Printing—Effective Crisis Response". Sustainability. 15 (4): 2857. Bibcode:2023Sust...15.2857K. doi:10.3390/su15042857. ISSN 2071-1050.
  21. ^ Pearce, Joshua M. (2020-04-30), "A review of open source ventilators for COVID-19 and future pandemics", F1000Research, 9: 218, doi:10.12688/f1000research.22942.2, PMC 7195895, PMID 32411358
  22. ^ Manoj, Aluri; Bhuyan, Monami; Raj Banik, Swarup; Ravi Sankar, Mamilla (2021-01-01). "3D printing of nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnose: Past and current trends". Materials Today: Proceedings. International Conference on Materials, Processing & Characterization. 44: 1361–1368. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.505. ISSN 2214-7853. PMC 7687488. PMID 33262931.
  23. ^ Gallup, Nicole; Pringle, Adam M.; Oberloier, Shane; Tanikella, Nagendra G.; Pearce, Joshua M. (October 2020). "Parametric nasopharyngeal swab for sampling COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses: Open source design, SLA 3-D printing and UV curing system". HardwareX. 8 e00135. doi:10.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00135. ISSN 2468-0672. PMC 7455530. PMID 32904317.
  24. ^ Callahan, Cody J.; Lee, Rose; Zulauf, Katelyn E.; Tamburello, Lauren; Smith, Kenneth P.; Previtera, Joe; Cheng, Annie; Green, Alex; Abdul Azim, Ahmed; Yano, Amanda; Doraiswami, Nancy; Kirby, James E.; Arnaout, Ramy A. (2020). "Open Development and Clinical Validation of Multiple 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Collection Swabs: Rapid Resolution of a Critical COVID-19 Testing Bottleneck". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 58 (8) e00876-20. doi:10.1128/jcm.00876-20. PMC 7383530. PMID 32393482.
  25. ^ Agarwal, Raj (2022-03-01). "The personal protective equipment fabricated via 3D printing technology during COVID-19". Annals of 3D Printed Medicine. 5 100042. doi:10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100042. ISSN 2666-9641. PMC 8667480. PMID 38620978.
  26. ^ Tarfaoui, Mostapha; Nachtane, Mourad; Goda, Ibrahim; Qureshi, Yumna; Benyahia, Hamza (2020-07-27). "3D Printing to Support the Shortage in Personal Protective Equipment Caused by COVID-19 Pandemic". Materials. 13 (15): 3339. Bibcode:2020Mate...13.3339T. doi:10.3390/ma13153339. ISSN 1996-1944. PMC 7436187. PMID 32727050.
  27. ^ Srai, Jagjit Singh; Kumar, Mukesh; Graham, Gary; Phillips, Wendy; Tooze, James; Ford, Simon; Beecher, Paul; Raj, Baldev; Gregory, Mike; Tiwari, Manoj Kumar; Ravi, B.; Neely, Andy; Shankar, Ravi; Charnley, Fiona; Tiwari, Ashutosh (2016). "Distributed manufacturing: Scope, challenges and opportunities". International Journal of Production Research. 54 (23): 6917–6935. Bibcode:2016IJPR...54.6917S. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1192302. Retrieved 2026-05-04.
  28. ^ Pearce, Joshua M. (2020-05-20). "Distributed Manufacturing of Open Source Medical Hardware for Pandemics". Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 4 (2): 49. doi:10.3390/jmmp4020049. ISSN 2504-4494.
  29. ^ Vieweg, Stefan (2021). Distributed manufacturing under pandemic conditions (Thesis thesis). Technische Universität Wien. doi:10.34726/hss.2021.81428.
  30. ^ Srai, Jagjit Singh; Kumar, Mukesh; Graham, Gary; Phillips, Wendy; Tooze, James; Ford, Simon; Beecher, Paul; Raj, Baldev; Gregory, Mike; Tiwari, Manoj Kumar; Ravi, B.; Neely, Andy; Shankar, Ravi; Charnley, Fiona; Tiwari, Ashutosh (2016). "Distributed manufacturing: Scope, challenges and opportunities". International Journal of Production Research. 54 (23): 6917–6935. Bibcode:2016IJPR...54.6917S. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1192302. Retrieved 2026-05-04.
  31. ^ Ardolino, Marco; Bacchetti, Andrea; Dolgui, Alexandre; Franchini, Guglielmo; Ivanov, Dmitry; Nair, Anand (2024). "The impacts of digital technologies on coping with the COVID-19 pandemic in the manufacturing industry: A systematic literature review". International Journal of Production Research. 62 (5): 1953–1976. doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2127960. Retrieved 2026-05-04.
  32. ^ a b c d Kostakis, V.; Bauwens, M. (2014): Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. (wiki)
  33. ^ Kostakis, V.; Papachristou, M. (2014): Commons-based peer production and digital fabrication: The case of a RepRap-based, Lego-built 3D printing-milling machine. In: Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 434 - 443
  34. ^ Kostakis, V; Fountouklis, M; Drechsler, W. (2013): Peer Production and Desktop Manufacturing: The Case of the Helix-T Wind Turbine Project. . In: Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(6), 773 - 800.
  35. ^ Campbell, Thomas, Christopher Williams, Olga Ivanova, and Banning Garrett. (2011): Could 3D Printing Change the World? Technologies, Potential, and Implications of Additive Manufacturing Archived August 15, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Washington: Atlantic Council of the United States
  36. ^ Bradshaw, Simon, Adrian Bowyer, and Patrick Haufe (2010): The Intellectual Property Implications of Low-Cost 3D Printing. In: SCRIPTed 7
  37. ^ Gershenfeld, Neil (2007): FAB: The Coming Revolution on your Desktop: From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Cambridge: Basic Books, p. 13-14
  38. ^ Mota, C., 2011, November. The rise of personal fabrication. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (pp. 279-288). ACM.
  39. ^ Corsini, L., Aranda-Jan, C. B., & Moultrie, J. (2019). Using digital fabrication tools to provide humanitarian and development aid in low-resource settings. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.02.003
  40. ^ Kostakis, Vasilis; Niaros, Vasilis; Giotitsas, Chris (2023-06-30). "Beyond global versus local: illuminating a cosmolocal framework for convivial technology development". Sustainability Science. 18 (5): 2309–2322. Bibcode:2023SuSc...18.2309K. doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01378-1. ISSN 1937-0709.
  41. ^ a b Kostakis, Vasilis; Pazaitis, Alex; Liarokapis, Minas (2023-06-20). "Beyond high-tech versus low-tech: A tentative framework for sustainable urban data governance". BigData&Society. 10 20539517231180583. doi:10.1177/20539517231180583. ISSN 2053-9517.Image This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  42. ^ Wardeh, M.; Nguema, J. (2024). "Contracting for Distributed Manufacturing" DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14422458
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributed_manufacturing&oldid=1352489871"